搜索专业人员
推荐专业人员:
2020-07-18
{"zh":"慎思雄辩·以行立言——利群所第二届青年律师辩论赛拉开帷幕","en":"Deliberate and eloquent, speak with action - The Second Youth Lawyer Debate Competition of Liqun Institute kicked off"}
正所谓“思则慧,辩则强。”辩论,是一种艺术,也是一种学问。在辩论赛中,语言的交锋、思维的碰撞以及默契的协作都能够让我们欣赏到思辨之美。以辩才为矛,以论才为盾,7月17日晚,“慎思雄辩·以行立言”利群所第二届青年律师辩论赛在律所学术报告厅拉开帷幕。
本次大赛采用3对3即团体辩论赛的模式,比赛分为开篇立论、自由辩论、总结陈词三个环节。我所创始合伙人周显根律师,顾问、行政法部主任李钟年律师,副主任、公司与资本市场部主任毛灵见律师,副主任、刑事部主任黄道进律师,高级合伙人、婚姻家事部主任周海龙律师担任本次辩论赛评委。
△张罗晗律师担任本届辩论赛主持
辩 题
正方
我们说什么都队
反方
他们说的都不队
谁与争锋
赛场上正反双方唇枪舌战、观点交锋、对抗激烈。在正反双方幽默风趣的一分钟开场白后,比赛进入开篇立论环节,正反方一辩开篇立论观点明确、思路清晰。在随后的自由辩论环节中,双方更是争锋相对,剑拔弩张,现场气氛迅速升温。正方辩手们精辟的措辞,犀利的语言,展现出咄咄逼人的气势。反方言论体现哲学性,随后乘胜追击,而处处紧逼盘问正方,双方辩手毫不示弱。最后,双方三辩以完整、清晰的总结陈词结束了本场辩论赛。双方文献数据的索引能力、思维逻辑的转变能力、语言表达的精准能力在本次辩论赛中都得到了充分的考验。
评委点评
比赛结束,评委们对每位选手每个环节出现的逻辑问题、理论观点、辩论技巧进行逐个分析,并为各位辩手提出了详尽的指导意见。
颁 奖
最佳辩手——张栩溢
最佳专业知识奖——陈奕帆
第二届青年律师辩论赛合影留念
此次辩论赛的成功举办,不仅有助于提高青年律师的逻辑思维能力、团队凝聚力和法律素养,更充分展示我所青年律师勤于思考、勇于探索的精神风貌,同时也为律所优化人才梯队建设,实践律所愿景和发展目标提供了充分的人才保障,为我所的可持续发展注入新的活力。
As the saying goes, "Thinking leads to wisdom, and debate leads to strength." Debate is both an art and a knowledge. In the debate competition, the exchange of language, the collision of thinking, and the tacit cooperation can all allow us to appreciate the beauty of speculation. On the evening of July 17, the second Youth Lawyers Debate Competition of Liqun Law Firm opened in the academic Lecture hall of the law firm.
This competition adopts a 3 on 3 team debate competition model, which is divided into three stages: opening argument, free debate, and summarizing speeches. Our founding partner, Lawyer Zhou Xiangen, consultant and Director of the Administrative Law Department, Lawyer Li Zhongnian, Deputy Director and Director of the Company and Capital Markets Department, Lawyer Mao Lingjian, Deputy Director and Director of the Criminal Department, Lawyer Huang Daojin, Senior Partner and Director of the Marriage and Family Affairs Department, Lawyer Zhou Hailong, served as judges for this debate competition.
△Lawyer Zhang Luohan serves as the host of this debate competition
Debate questions
Square
Everything we say is right for the team
con side
What they said is not right for the team
The Contender
On the field, both sides engaged in verbal battles, exchanged opinions, and faced off fiercely. After a humorous and witty one minute opening speech from both sides, the competition enters the opening argument stage, where both sides have clear arguments and clear ideas. In the subsequent free debate segment, the two sides were even more at odds, with swords drawn and the atmosphere rapidly warming up. The incisive wording and sharp language of the legitimate debaters demonstrate an aggressive aura. The anti dialect theory embodies philosophical nature, and then takes advantage of the victory to pursue it, while pressing and questioning the right side everywhere, with both sides showing no weakness in their arguments. Finally, both sides concluded the debate with a complete and clear summary of their statements. The indexing ability, logical transformation ability, and precise language expression ability of both parties' literature data have been fully tested in this debate competition.
Slow Ride
At the end of the competition, the judges analyzed each contestant's logical problems, theoretical viewpoints, and debate skills in each stage, and provided detailed guidance for the debaters.
Awards
Best Debater - Zhang Xuyi
Best Professional Knowledge Award - Chen Yifan
Group photo of the 2nd Youth Lawyer Debate Competition
The successful holding of this debate competition not only helps to improve the logical thinking ability, team cohesion, and legal literacy of young lawyers, but also fully demonstrates the spirit of our young lawyers who are diligent in thinking and brave in exploration. At the same time, it also provides sufficient talent protection for the law firm to optimize the talent team construction, practice the law firm's vision and development goals, and inject new vitality into our sustainable development.
扫描二维码添加企业微信