为了不断提升律师的专业技能，形成业务交流、比学赶超的良好氛围，1月4日晚，利群所开展2020年度“十大优秀案例”评选活动。

经评选委员会初评，最终在报送的23个案例中选出15个案例参加2020年度“十大优秀案例”评选。

△实习律师张栩溢

01

评委阵容

# （按下图从左到右依次排序）

台州市律师协会副会长、浙江利群律师事务所顾问  柳泖

温岭市人大常委会监察和司法工作委员会主任、中国人民大学律师学院兼职副教授、浙江大学法学硕士  林晨

台州市人民检察院副检察长、中国计量大学法学院硕士生导师、法学博士  王勇

中共台州市委党校政法与公共管理教研室主任、副教授，台州市优秀教师  杨文杰

台州市椒江区人大常委会监察和司法工作委员会主任  朱福高

浙江利群律师事务所顾问、行政法部主任  李中年

02

案例报告

    本次案例评选活动不仅是评比，也是一次优秀案例的复盘，案例类型可谓丰富多彩，涵盖了刑事、民事、行政、知识产权及个人破产等专业类型。每一个优秀案例的产生，都凝结了各位律师的心血与专业。是否真正做到抽丝剥茧洞悉最本质的法律问题？是否雪中送炭解决客户的燃眉之急？让我们一起进入2020年度“优秀案例评选活动”终评阶段，来聆听各位律师6分钟的精彩阐述。

03

评选结果

2020年度“十大优秀案例”

# 报送案例：台州市某机械有限公司诉台州市某械厂侵害实用新型专利权纠纷案

# 报送律师：何良雄、毛灵见、王健

# 报送案例：颜某诉玉环某支局、台州市某局撤销行政处罚案

# 报送律师：周显根、林统

# 报送案例：石某防卫过当致人死亡案

# 报送律师：应灵潇、蔡婉瑛

# 报送案例：台州市某休闲用品有限公司诉义乌市某户外野营用具有限公司、某侵害商业纠纷案

# 报送律师：何良雄

#报送案例：李某涉嫌组织卖淫无罪辩护案

#报送律师：黄道进、潘婵、张罗晗

# 报送案例：王某亮敲诈勒索数额特别巨大从犯辩护成功案

# 报送律师：王莹、王新平

# 报送案例：某公司侵害外观设计专利权纠纷二审改判案

# 报送律师：毛灵见、蒋圳

# 报送案例：杨某诉某公司、某某公司提供劳务者受害责任纠纷案

# 报送律师：田景云

# 报送案例：陈某与某县综合行政执法局行政复议纠纷案

# 报送律师：王健、顾奇誌

# 报送案例：张某涉嫌虚开增值税专用发票无罪辩护案

# 报送律师：黄道进、张罗晗、潘婵

2020年度入围优秀案例

#报送案例：何某诈骗国家专项补助资金二审改判案  

#报送律师：陈俊伟

#报送案例：曹某个人债务集中清理案   

#报送律师：冯懿、阮涛涛

#报送案例：上海某有限公司与台州某有限公司驰名商标宣告无效纠纷案

#报送律师：江宁

#报送案例：某保险股份有限公司某市分公司与李某保险人代位求偿权纠纷管辖权异议案  

#报送律师：项登霖、蔡辉强

#报送案例：甲女诉乙男变更抚养关系纠纷案

#报送律师：闫龙华、李雅倩

04

评选总结

最后，王新平主任对本次评选活动做了总结。他指出，相比去年而言，今年报送的案例数量更加多、质量更加高、类型更加丰富。同时他也就此次的评选对各位律师提出了5点要求：1.案例标题要规范；2.上台着装要正式；3.亮点提炼要到位；4.报告表达要提高；5.时间掌控要精准。

利群所每年组织优秀案例评选并给予表彰，旨在营造相互学习、共同提高的氛围，同时也是为了树立学习标杆，从同事的办案经验中找差距、发现并弥补自己的不足，从而使律所的每一个案件都经得起检验，成为“经典”。活动虽落幕，专业仍不断在精进，静候利群人吹响更多胜利的号角！

In order to continuously improve lawyers' professional skills and create a favorable atmosphere for business communication and academic comparison, on the evening of January 4th, Liqun Institute launched the 2020 "Top Ten Excellent Cases" selection activity.

After preliminary evaluation by the selection committee, 15 out of the 23 submitted cases were ultimately selected to participate in the 2020 "Top 10 Excellent Cases" selection.

△Intern Lawyer Zhang Xuyi

01

Judges' lineup

#(Sort from left to right according to the following diagram)

Liu Mao, Vice President of Taizhou Lawyers Association and Advisor to Zhejiang Liqun Law Firm

Lin Chen, Director of the Supervision and Judicial Work Committee of the Standing Committee of Wenling Municipal People's Congress, Adjunct Associate Professor of the Inns of Court of Renmin University of China, Master of Laws of Zhejiang University

Wang Yong, Deputy Procurator General of Taizhou People's Procuratorate, Master Supervisor of Law School of China Jiliang University, and Doctor of Law

Yang Wenjie, Director and Associate Professor of the Political Science, Law and Public Management Teaching and Research Office of the Taizhou Municipal Party School of the Communist Party of China, and Outstanding Teacher of Taizhou City

Zhu Fugao, Director of the Supervision and Judicial Work Committee of the Standing Committee of the People's Congress of Jiaojiang District, Taizhou

Li Zhongzhong, Consultant and Director of the Administrative Law Department of Zhejiang Liqun Law Firm

02

Case report

This case selection activity is not only an evaluation, but also a review of excellent cases. The case types are rich and colorful, covering criminal, civil, administrative, intellectual property, Personal bankruptcy and other professional types. The emergence of every excellent case embodies the hard work and professionalism of all lawyers. Is it true to peel off the cocoon and gain insight into the most fundamental legal issues? Is it a timely solution to customers' urgent needs? Let's enter the final evaluation stage of the 2020 "Excellent Case Selection Activity" and listen to the wonderful 6-minute explanations from all the lawyers.

03

Selection results 

Top Ten Excellent Cases in 2020

#Reported case: A dispute case of a certain machinery limited company in Taizhou City suing a certain machinery factory in Taizhou City for infringement of utility model patent rights

#Submitted to lawyers: He Liangxiong, Mao Lingjian, Wang Jian

#Reported case: Yan sued a branch of Yuhuan and a bureau of Taizhou City for revoking administrative penalties

#Submitted to lawyers: Zhou Xiangen, Lin Tong

#Reported case: Case of Shi's excessive defense leading to death

#Reporting lawyers: Ying Lingxiao, Cai Wanying

#Reported cases: a leisure goods limited company in Taizhou City sued an outdoor camping equipment limited company in Yiwu City, and a case of commercial infringement

#Submitted to Lawyer: He Liangxiong

#Reported case: Li is suspected of organizing prostitution as an innocent defense case

#Reporting lawyers: Huang Daojin, Pan Chan, Zhang Luohan

#Reported case: Wang Mouliang's extortion amount is particularly large, and the accomplice's defense is successful

#Submitted to lawyers: Wang Ying, Wang Xinping

#Reported case: Second instance amendment of a dispute over infringement of design patent rights by a certain company

#Submitted to lawyers: Mao Lingjian, Jiang Zhen

#Reported case: Yang sued a certain company and a dispute over the liability of a company providing labor services for victims

#Submitted to Lawyer: Tian Jingyun

#Reported case: Administrative reconsideration dispute between Chen and the Comprehensive Administrative Law Enforcement Bureau of a certain county

#Submitted to lawyers: Wang Jian, Gu Qizhi

#Reported case: Zhang is suspected of falsifying value-added tax special invoices and pleading not guilty

#Reporting lawyers: Huang Daojin, Zhang Luohan, Pan Chan

Outstanding cases shortlisted for 2020

#Reported case: He's case of fraud in the second instance of national special subsidy funds

#Submitted to Lawyer: Chen Junwei

#Report case: Cao's personal debt centralized liquidation case

#Reporting lawyers: Feng Yi, Ruan Taotao

#Reported case: Dispute over the invalidation of well-known trademarks between a limited company in Shanghai and a limited company in Taizhou

#Submitted to Lawyer: Jiang Ning

#Report case: Proposal on jurisdictional differences in subrogation disputes between a certain insurance company's branch in a certain city and an insurer named Li

#Reporting lawyers: Xiang Denglin, Cai Huiqiang

#Reported case: A female lawsuit against B male change of upbringing relationship dispute case

#Reporting lawyers: Yan Longhua, Li Yaqian

04

Selection Summary

Finally, Director Wang Xinping summarized the selection activity. He pointed out that compared to last year, the number of cases submitted this year is higher, the quality is higher, and the types are more diverse. At the same time, he also put forward five requirements for lawyers regarding this selection: 1. The case title should be standardized; 2. Dress formally when going on stage; 3. Highlight extraction should be in place; 4. The expression of the report should be improved; 5. Time control should be precise.

Liqun Institute organizes an annual selection of excellent cases and rewards them, aiming to create an atmosphere of mutual learning and mutual improvement. At the same time, it is also to set a learning benchmark, identify gaps from colleagues' case handling experience, and make up for their own shortcomings, so that every case of the law firm can withstand testing and become a "classic". Although the event has come to an end, the profession is still constantly improving, waiting for the Li Qun people to sound more trumpets of victory!