“用公开促公正 建设核心价值”主题教育活动

打击危害食品、药品安全违法犯罪典型案例

目录

1.广西华联综合超市有限公司销售不符合安全标准的食品案

2.陶昌醒等生产、销售不符合安全标准食品案

3.徐丙华生产、销售不符合安全标准食品案

4.黄宁、曾荣芬、刘旭旺销售伪劣产品案

5.谢天、李华春生产、销售不符合安全标准食品案

6.赵榜河生产、销售有毒、有害食品案

7.刘希强等人生产、销售伪劣（香油）产品、对非国家工作人员行贿案

8.吐某生产、销售不符合安全标准食品案

9.桑某生产销售伪劣产品案

10.姚扬业生产、销售有毒、有害食品案

11.麻秀龙生产销售有毒、有害食品案

12.邱某某生产、销售有毒、有害食品案

13.张益祥、张庆裕、农秀勤生产、销售有毒、有害食品案

14.张佳章销售不符合安全标准食品案

一、广西华联综合超市有限公司销售不符合安全标准的食品案

（一）基本案情

2014年4月23日,叶润军在广西华联综合超市(以下简称华联超市)购买了7罐2013年11月20日生产的，保质期为18个月的事农茶花菇预包装食品，每罐73元，共花费511元。后叶润军发现其所购茶花菇菇体布满死昆虫和活虫，叶润军多次与华联超市交涉协商，要求华联超市退回货款及赔偿，但双方无法达成一致意见。叶润军遂向广西壮族自治区南宁市江南区人民法院起诉，请求华联超市返还购货款511元，并支付价款十倍的赔偿金5110元。

（二）裁判结果

法院经审理认为，叶润军在华联超市购买了7罐事农茶花菇预包装食品，双方之间买卖关系成立，合法有效。《中华人民共和国食品安全法》第三条关于“食品生产经营者应当按照法律、法规和食品安全标准从事生产经营活动，对社会和公众负责，保证食品安全，接受社会监督，承担社会责任”是有关销售者的产品质量责任和义务的相关规定。食品销售者，不仅应当审查食品的资质证明、合格证明，还应确保食品安全。本案中，凭肉眼可观察到华联超市销售的茶花菇菇体上布有死昆虫及活虫，包装瓶瓶底亦有死昆虫，因此，华联超市销售的茶花菇不符合食品安全标准。华联超市以其出售的茶花菇符合食品安全标准，且华联超市不存在明知不符合食品安全标准而销售的答辩意见本院不予认可。根据《中华人民共和国食品安全法》第九十六条规定，生产不符合食品安全标准的食品或者销售明知是不符合食品安全标准的食品，消费者除要求赔偿损失外，还可以向生产者或者销售者要求支付价款十倍的赔偿金。故叶润军要求华联超市退还货款并支付货款十倍赔偿金的诉讼请求，法院予以支持。

（三）典型意义

依照我国食品安全法的规定，食品安全是指食品无毒、无害，符合应当有的营养要求，对人体健康不造成任何急性、亚急性或者慢性危害。食品销售者负有保证食品安全的法定义务，应当对不符合安全标准的食品及时清理下架。本案中，华联超市销售长虫的茶花菇未能及时清理下架，系不履行法定义务的行为，应当被认定为销售明知是不符合食品安全标准的食品。在此情况下，消费者可以同时主张赔偿损失和价款十倍的赔偿金，也可以只主张价款十倍的赔偿金。叶润军要求华联超市退还货款并支付售价十倍的赔偿金，于法有据，应予支持。判决后，华联超市未上诉。

二、陶昌醒等生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品案

（一）基本案情

2013年以来，被告人周明忠、李雄梅、文绍明（另案处理）为牟取非法利益，在无经营资格且未经卫生检验检疫部门检疫的情况下，从南宁市周边县镇收购死因不明的或病死的猪，其中，周明忠、李雄梅在南宁市兴宁区人民路北一里431号房内对上述收购来的猪进行切分并销售。被告人姚寿林、唐玉奎则在南宁市兴宁区人民路北一里247号帮助文绍明，将文绍明收购来的死因不明或病死猪进行切分并销售。

2014年1月17日，工商部门联合公安机关在南宁市兴宁区人民路北一里431号房内查获周明忠、李雄梅收购的并在切分的疑似病死猪的猪肉1932斤，在南宁市兴宁区人民路北一里247号房内查获文绍明收购的并由姚寿林、唐玉奎切分的疑似病死猪的猪肉1218斤。并抓获被告人周明忠、李雄梅、姚寿林、唐玉奎。经鉴定，从两处查获的猪肉中检出伪狂犬病毒、猪繁殖和呼吸综合症（蓝耳病）病毒核酸、高致病性猪蓝耳病病毒核酸及猪圆环病毒呈阳性。

另查明，2011年12月起，被告人陶昌醒、黄燕玲、陶国炎为牟取非法利益，先后从“肥英”、周明忠、文绍明处购买切分好的死因不明或病死猪的猪肉，由被告人陶国炎驾驶车辆将猪肉运回南宁市兴宁区燕子岭上六巷23号陶昌醒等人租住的房屋内，三人共同将购回的猪肉加工制作成叉烧后销售至南宁市内的石户桂林米粉店。经核算，仅2013年10月28日至2014年1月25日期间，销售给石户米粉店的叉烧达6702斤，金额为125735元。

（二）裁判结果

广西壮族自治区南宁市兴宁区人民法院经审理认为，被告人陶昌醒、周明忠、黄燕玲、陶国炎、李雄梅、姚寿林、唐玉奎购买死因不明或病、死猪进行加工，制作成食品对外销售。依照《最高人民法院、最高人民检察院关于办理危害食品安全刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的规定，属于病死、死因不明或者检验检疫不合格的畜、禽、兽、水产动物及其肉类、肉类制品的，应当认定为刑法第一百四十三条规定的“足以造成严重食物中毒事故或者其他严重食源性疾病”，构成生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪。故本案七被告人的行为均已触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百四十三条之规定，构成生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪。据此，依照刑法有关规定，以生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪判处被告人陶昌醒有期徒刑五年，并处罚金人民币二十万元；以生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪判处被告人陶国炎有期徒刑四年，并处罚金人民币十万元；以生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪判处被告人黄燕玲有期徒刑三年，并处罚金人民币九万元；以生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪判处被告人周明忠有期徒刑三年，并处罚金人民币九万元；以生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪判处被告人李雄梅有期徒刑二年二个月，并处罚金人民币五万元；以生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪判处被告人姚寿林有期徒刑二年，并处罚金人民币三万元；以生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪判处被告人唐玉奎有期徒刑二年，并处罚金人民币三万元。

（三）典型意义

本案是一起社会影响广泛、涉及人民群众食品安全的案件。南宁市石户桂林米粉店是有一定影响力的本地知名米粉品牌，米粉也是深受本地人民群众喜爱的食品。在食品安全问题多发，食品安全日益受到重视的今天，仍有不法分子为谋取不法利益，不顾国家对食品安全犯罪的高压政策，在食品生产过程中使用不合格原料或者掺入不法添加剂，赚昧心钱。人民法院综合考虑陶昌醒、陶国炎、黄燕玲、周明忠、李雄梅、姚寿林、唐玉奎生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品的犯罪事实、性质、情节和危害后果，对七人依法判处有期徒刑二至五年，并处罚金人民币三万至二十万元不等的刑罚，符合罪责刑相一致原则。

三、徐丙华生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品案

（一）基本案情

被告人徐丙华经营管理南宁市石户桂林米粉店并负责食材的采购，徐丙华在采购食材时未要求陶昌醒等人提供工商执照、食品流通证、健康证等相关证件，以明显低于市场价格从2011年底开始长期低价从陶昌醒处订购使用病死或死因不明的猪肉制作的叉烧用于叉烧粉的制作及销售，将叉烧粉提供给顾客食用。经鉴定，2013年10月28日至2014年1月25日期间，南宁市石户桂林米粉店向陶昌醒处订购叉烧达6702斤，价值达125735元。被告人徐丙华指示员工农永青在制作石户米粉店的《餐饮单位食品原料进货验收台帐》中填写虚假信息，以备南宁市食品药品监督管理部门的抽检。

（二）裁判结果

广西壮族自治区南宁市兴宁区人民法院经审理认为，被告人徐丙华购买死因不明或病死猪肉制作的叉烧用于叉烧粉的制作，销售给顾客食用，并具有其他严重情节，其行为触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百四十三条之规定，构成生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪。据此，依照刑法有关规定，以生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪判处被告人徐丙华有期徒刑五年，并处罚金人民币二十万元。

（三）典型意义

本案是一起社会影响广泛、涉及人民群众食品安全的案件。南宁市石户桂林米粉店是有一定影响力的本地知名米粉品牌，米粉也是深受本地人民群众喜爱的食品。在食品安全问题多发，食品安全日益受到重视的今天，仍有不法分子为谋取不法利益，不顾国家对食品安全犯罪的高压政策，在食品生产过程中使用不合格原料或者掺入不法添加剂，赚昧心钱。人民法院综合考虑徐丙华生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品的犯罪事实、性质、情节和危害后果，对其依法判处有期徒刑五年，并处罚金人民币二十万元，符合罪责刑相一致原则。

四、黄宁、曾荣芬、刘旭旺销售伪劣产品案

（一）基本案情

被告人黄宁系柳州市大鹏农资有限公司的法定代表人，该公司主要经营农药、种子、化肥等。被告人曾荣芬、刘旭旺系夫妻关系，2009年，夫妻二人在象州县马坪镇马坪新街5号注资成立象州马坪旭旺农资经营部，业主为曾荣芬，经营范围为农药、化肥及种子。平时由刘旭旺负责进货，由曾荣芬负责销售。2012年12月份，被告人黄宁从郑州万安特农化产品有限公司购进“长制®”2%吡虫啉农药，在明知该农药适用于防治黄瓜蚜虫的情况下，其为了增加销量，扩大宣传该农药适用于防治甘蔗的害虫，并以每件370元的价格销售了202件的“长制®”2%吡虫啉农药给马坪旭旺农资经营部，销售额74740元。马坪旭旺农资经营部的被告人曾荣芬、刘旭旺从柳州大鹏农资公司购进了202件的“长制®”2%吡虫啉农药后，其二人主观上均明知该农药的真实性能即防治黄瓜的蚜虫，但其为了增加销售量，将该农药销售给农户时宣传为适用于防治甘蔗的害虫，致使马坪镇大槽屯的秦某某等农户在购买该农药施用于防治甘蔗的害虫，但甘蔗的害虫没有被杀死，造成蔗农损失。经查，被告人曾荣芬、刘旭旺共销售了1512包，每包的售价是55元，总销售额83160元。经广西壮族自治区农药鉴定所鉴定，“长制®”2%吡虫啉农药系不合格产品。

（二）裁判结果

象州县人民法院审理认为，被告人黄宁、曾荣芬、刘旭旺明知“长制®”2%吡虫啉农药适用于黄瓜蚜虫的防治，但为了牟利，将该产品大肆宣传为防治甘蔗的害虫，并销售给蔗农用于喷杀甘蔗的害虫，其行为属于以假充真，且销售金额均达五万元以上，均已触犯刑律，构成销售伪劣产品罪。被告人黄宁作为自然人投资的柳州市大鹏农资有限公司的法定代表人，应对该公司的销售金额负责。而被告人曾荣芬、刘旭旺在销售伪劣产品中，一人负责进货，一人负责销售，相互配合，属共同犯罪，且均为主犯，均应按其所参与的全部犯罪处罚。案发后，被告人黄宁主动到公安机关投案，并如实供述了其销售伪劣产品的事实，是自首，依法可以从轻或者减轻处罚。被告人曾荣芬、刘旭旺归案后也能如实供述其销售伪劣产品的事实，当庭自愿认罪，依法均可对其从轻处罚。此外，案发后被告人曾荣芬、刘旭旺能退给蔗农农药款，有一定的悔罪表现，可对此二被告人酌情从轻处罚。故判决被告人黄宁犯销售伪劣产品罪，判处罚金人民币八万元;被告人曾荣芬犯销售伪劣产品罪，判处罚金人民币四万元;被告人刘旭旺犯销售伪劣产品罪，判处罚金人民币四万元。

（三）典型意义

民生案件与公民个人的生存发展和家庭的基本利益密切相关，我国司法机关历来十分重视涉及民生案件的宣判及执行。本案中，黄宁、曾荣芬、刘旭旺明知“长制®”2%吡虫啉农药适用于黄瓜蚜虫的防治，但为了牟利，仍将该产品大肆宣传为防治甘蔗的害虫，并销售给蔗农用于喷杀甘蔗的害虫，最终影响甘蔗生长，给蔗农造成巨大损失，法院依法对此案进行宣判，给广大农药商予以法律震慑，鲜活的案例告诫其切不可为了一己私利，让农民遭受损失，自己走上违法犯罪道路。

五、谢天、李华春生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品案

（一）基本案情

2013年11月底至12月间，谢天、李华春受他人（另案处理）雇请，多次用货车从广东省化州市收购、运输死猪回玉林市玉州区仁东镇旺卢村的肉类加工场，由他人进行加工销售。2013年12月23日，李华春、谢天驾驶一辆货车到广东省化州市合江镇合江桥，收购了一批死因不明且未经动物卫生监督机构检疫的死猪。次日6时许，二人运输该批死猪（共5.57吨）返回玉林，途经玉林市玉州区秀水路时被公安民警查获。经检验，涉案死猪含伪狂犬病病毒和猪圆环病毒。

（二）裁判结果

原审法院认为，谢天、李华春生产、销售不符合食品安全标准的食品，足以造成严重食物中毒事故或者其他严重食源性疾病，其行为已触犯刑律，构成生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪。谢天、李华春共同故意犯罪，属共同犯罪；在生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品共同犯罪中，谢天、李华春均起次要作用，是从犯，依法应当从轻处罚。谢天、李华春归案后，如实交代自己的罪行，是坦白，依法可以从轻处罚。据此，原审法院依照相关法律判决：一、被告人李华春犯生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪，判处有期徒刑二年六个月，并处罚金四万元；二、被告人谢天犯生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪，判处有期徒刑二年五个月，并处罚金四万元。

谢天上诉提出，在本案中其是受他人雇佣收购、运输死猪，是从犯，且归案后认罪态度好，请求二审法院对其从宽处罚。二审玉林市中院认为，上诉人（原审被告人）谢天、原审被告人李华春生产、销售不符合食品安全标准的食品，足以造成严重食物中毒事故或者其他严重食源性疾病，其行为已触犯刑律，构成生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪。谢天、李华春共同故意犯罪，是共同犯罪；在生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品共同犯罪中，谢天、李华春均起次要作用，是从犯，依法应当从轻处罚。谢天、李华春归案后，如实交代自己的罪行，依法可以从轻处罚。综上，原审法院根据谢天、李华春犯罪的事实，犯罪的性质、情节及对于社会的危害程度依法所作的判决，认定事实清楚，证据确实、充分，定罪准确，量刑适当，适用法律正确，应予维持；谢天上诉理由不成立，依法予以驳回。遂于2015年6月作出终审裁定：驳回上诉，维持原判。

（三）典型意义

国以民为本，民以食为天，食以安为先。食品药品安全水平是决定人民群众生活水平和幸福指数的重要指标之一。生活在一个能确保食品药品安全的环境里，是人民群众应有的权利和尊严，也是整个社会的底线。然而，近年来我国相继出现的地沟油、毒胶囊等事件，一次次地以各种方式挑战社会的底线，严重危害人民群众的身体健康和生命安全，严重影响国家形象，损害党和政府的公信力。人民法院充分发挥刑事审判职能作用，贯彻落实宽严相济刑事政策，依法从严惩处涉食品药品安全犯罪案件，切实保障了食品药品安全。

六、赵榜河生产、销售有毒、有害食品案

（一）基本案情

2010年至2014年期间，被告人赵榜河在苍梧县京南镇木播村枧尾组经营小作坊生产腐竹，将禁止添加到食品的非食品添加剂硼砂添加到生产的腐竹中，并予以销售。2014年4月25日，公安人员查获该小作坊并扣押了生产的腐竹及原料豆浆。经检验，所扣押的腐竹以及原料豆浆均检出硼砂成分。

（二）裁判结果

苍梧县人民法院经审理认为，被告人赵榜河违反国家食品管理法规，在生产的腐竹中掺入有毒、有害的非食品原料硼砂，并予以销售，其行为构成生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪。依照刑法有关规定，以生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪判处被告人赵榜河有期徒刑一年，缓刑一年六个月，并处罚金人民币5000元。

（三）典型意义

生产、销售有毒、有害食品案，此前对该类案件入刑标准很严格，主要看有没有造成食物中毒等较严重的后果才构成犯罪，《刑法修正案(八)》出台后，加重对生产、销售有毒、有害食品行为的处罚，只要有生产、销售有害食品行为便构罪，就应当追究刑事责任。在此案中，仅管被告人添加的禁用食品添加剂的用量很小，没有造成严重后果。但食品生产者必须保障食品安全，避免悲剧发生。同时，作为广大消费者，要擦亮双眼，善于识别危害性食品，多了解食品安全相关知识及有关法律规定，对于食品危害行为要敢于说“不”，共同营造良好的食品安全环境。

七、刘希强等人生产、销售伪劣（香油）产品、对非国家工作人员行贿案

（一）基本案情  

2006年，被告人刘希强、郭秀波共同出资成立哈尔滨希强调味品有限公司。二人为降低生产成本，谋取非法利益，从被告人薛现民处购入香油香精和粗制棉籽油后，指使被告人唐长友等人将香油香精、粗制棉籽油与色拉油勾兑成伪劣香油，或在香油中按一定比例掺入伪劣香油，经灌装、包装后销售，销售金额人民币1千余万元。2012年8月，刘希强在蜂蜜中掺入购买的麦芽糖浆，制成伪劣蜂蜜进行销售，销售金额人民币20余万元。刘希强为向天手公司二厂、天手公司饺子厂销售其生产的伪劣香油，指使他人按照销售数量向天手公司二厂采购员曹研、天手公司饺子厂厂长于光（另案处理）行贿4万余元，

（二）裁判结果

绥化市中级人民法院一审判决认定被告人刘希强犯生产、销售伪劣产品罪，判处有期徒刑十五年，并处罚金人民币600万元，犯对非国家工作人员行贿罪，判处有期徒刑二年，决定执行有期徒刑十六年，并处罚金人民币600万元；被告人薛现民犯生产伪劣产品罪，判处有期徒刑八年，并处罚金人民币50万元；对被告人唐长友、郭秀波以生产伪劣产品罪和销售伪劣产品罪分别判处刑罚。宣判后，刘希强、薛现民提出上诉。黑龙江省高级人民法院经审理，裁定驳回上诉，维持原判。

（三）典型意义

本案是一起典型的生产、销售假冒伪劣产品犯罪案件。四被告人为牟取非法利益，在生产香油和蜂蜜过程中掺杂、掺假，以次充好、以假充真，将伪劣产品进行销售，涉案金额巨大，严重侵犯了国家对产品质量的监督管理制度和消费者的合法权益。刘希强为谋取竞争优势，向非国家工作人员行贿，又侵犯了企业正常业务活动和公平竞争的交易秩序。此类犯罪行为的发生对企业产品质量诚信造成严重侵害，有损经济社会发展环境评价，必须依法严惩。

八、吐某生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品案

（一）基本案情

2012年1月起，被告人吐某在没有办理相关手续的情况下，在泽普县泽普镇古勒巴格乡路口开设了《佳吾海尔快餐》，从事煮（烤）鸡肉销售生意。7月25日，其存放在冰箱里的15只生鸡肉变质坏掉（腐烂）。被告人违反国家食品卫生管理规定，明知这坏掉的15只生鸡肉和冰箱里的其他鸡肉已变质（腐烂），还是把这些鸡肉煮（卤）（烤）好后销售给顾客。7月25日早晨至7月26日18时，先后有53名顾客分别购买了变质腐烂的烤鸡 57只，造成古某等193人食用后中毒，并造成古某和阿某2人中毒死亡。

经法医对尸体进行检验鉴定，认为死者古某和阿某因生前食用被伤寒沙门氏菌污染的食品（鸡肉），出现全身中毒症状，最终以水电解质紊乱，急性呼吸功能衰竭，经抢救无效而死亡。经喀什地区疾病预防控制中心检验检测，检查出被告人吐某和被害人中的托某、艾某等人体内都有伤寒沙门氏菌。

（二）裁判结果

泽普县人民法院认为，被告人吐某无视国家法律和社会公德，在明知自己销售的烤鸡是不符合卫生标准的变质鸡肉，但仍然煮（卤）（烤）后进行销售，结果导致两人严重食物中毒死亡、193人不同程度中毒的食品安全事件，造成特别严重的后果，严重侵犯了公民的人身权利，其行为构成生产、销售不符合安全标准的食品罪，应依法严惩，但被告人与附带民事诉讼原告人已达成民事赔偿调解协议，亦取得了被害方的谅解，并且有深刻的悔罪表现，因此在考虑这些方面的基础上，对被告人在法定刑范围内，可以适当从轻处罚。公诉机关指控的犯罪事实及罪名能够成立，本院依法予以支持，并且可以采纳公诉机关的量刑建议。法院依法判决：被告人吐某犯生产、销售不符合安全标准食品罪，判处有期徒刑11年，并处罚金10000元，剥夺政治权利2 年。该判决已经发生法律效力。

（三）典型意义

民以食为天。食品、药品安全事关人民群众身体健康和生命安全，事关经济发展与社会和谐。近年来，我国一些重大、恶性食品安全事件接连不断，瘦肉精、毒奶粉、毒豆芽、地沟油、问题胶囊、病死猪肉等系列案件相继出现，显现出当前社会的食品安全形势不容乐观。面对这种形势，人民法院始终努力履行职能依法保护人民群众生命、财产安全，对涉及食品、药品安全的犯罪活动出重手、下重拳，坚决打掉不法分子的嚣张气焰，增强民生保障的责任感，彰显社会主义司法的震慑力和威慑力，弘扬社会正气。

九、桑某生产销售伪劣产品案

（一）基本案情                                    

2007年11月下旬，被告人许某从昌吉市吉丰公司职员芦艳花处先后购进其声称是“303”的油葵种子。2008年春季，由徐某（因犯销售伪劣种子已被判处有期徒刑11年）在布尔津县阔斯特克乡杰特阿尕什村销售该油葵种子，该村村民及邻村村民高某等21户被害人以直接或转让的方式，共在许某处购买其声称是“303”的油葵种子1683公斤。21户被害人共种植2630亩油葵，支付种子款99，885元。高某等被害农户在油葵生长期发现油葵发叉现象十分严重，遂联名向布尔津县种子站申请对其所种植的油葵种子进行鉴定。2008年9月6日，经专家鉴定，认定被害农户所种植的油葵种子是假种子。2008年9月25日，被害农户又申请专家进行田间实地估产鉴定，经专家鉴定，高某等被害农户所种植的油葵产量损失337，000公斤，共价值人民币1，213，200元。2009年5月21日，经新疆农林业司法鉴定所鉴定，高某等被害农户所种植的油葵产量损失339，700公斤，油葵单价为3.10元，共计价值人民币1，053，070元。其中，被告人桑某（徐某之妻）在该案中与徐某共同销售假冒303油葵种子445公斤，销售金额达25，070元，涉及被害农户因绝收、减产而遭受经济损失达344，437.35元。

另查明，19名附带民事诉讼原告人已获得赔偿款516，000元，其中被告人许某赔偿100，000元，罪犯徐某赔偿16000元。

（二）裁判结果

布尔津县人民法院一审判决和阿勒泰地区中级人民法院二审判决认为，被告人许某与罪犯徐某共同销售无标识的假冒“303”油葵种子，致使被害农户因减产而遭受1，044，700元特别重大的经济损失，严重破坏了国家对种子质量的监督管理制度，其行为直接危害了农业生产，已构成销售伪劣种子罪。公诉机关指控被告人许某的犯罪事实清楚，证据确实充分，指控罪名成立，本院予以支持。本案中，被告人桑某与许某共同销售假冒“303”油葵种子，被告人桑某参与销售假冒“303”油葵种子致使被害农户因减产而遭受344，437.35元重大的经济损失，其行为已构成销售伪劣种子罪。公诉机关指控被告人桑某的犯罪事实清楚，证据确实充分，指控罪名成立，本院予以支持。被告人许某在共同犯罪中起主要作用，系主犯，应当按照其所参与的全部犯罪处罚。对其辩护人提出系从犯的辩护意见不予采纳。被告人许某在公安机关尚未发现其犯罪事实时，主动向公安机关投案自首，并如实供述犯罪事实，属自首，可从轻处罚。对其辩护人提出被告人许某系自首的辩护意见予以采纳。被告人许某已赔偿被害人损失10万元，具有一定悔罪表现，可酌情从轻处罚。被告人桑某在销售伪劣种子犯罪中起次要作用，系从犯，应当从轻处罚。被告人桑某主动赔偿被害人部分经济损失，具有一定悔罪表现，可酌情从轻处罚。根据本案被告人桑某的犯罪事实、犯罪性质、情节，适用缓刑不致再危害社会，对其可适用缓刑。据此，法院依法判决：被告人许某犯销售伪劣种子罪，判处有期徒刑七年，并处罚金98，885.00元。被告人桑某犯销售伪劣种子罪，判处有期徒刑三年，缓刑四年，并处罚金25，070元。假冒“303”油葵种子封样品予以没收。被告人许某于判决生效后就罪犯许某赔偿附带民事诉讼原告人高某等附带民事诉讼原告人损失489，640元，承担连带赔偿责任。被告人桑某于判决生效后就罪犯许某赔偿上述附带民事诉讼原告人高某等油葵损失承担连带赔偿责任。被告人许某、桑某于判决生效后就罪犯许某赔偿附带民事诉讼原告人高某等19人鉴定费5000元、诉讼费7787.40元、交通费3000元承担连带赔偿责任。

(三) 典型意义

农业种子的质量好坏事关农民群众切身利益、更关系到农粮生产安全。现在社会上出现少数不法之徒销售假冒伪劣种子的恶劣犯罪行径对农民群众生产积极性伤害极大，更有甚者造成农民家庭倾家荡产，影响恶劣。人民法院对此类犯罪行为一直以来始终坚持依法从严惩处，对实施此类犯罪的人员绝不姑息、采取高压态势形成震慑效应，做到除恶务尽，保护人民群众的合法权益，维护风清气正的法治环境。

十、姚扬业生产、销售有毒、有害的食品案

（一）基本案情

2013年6月份起，被告人姚扬业在灵山县新圩镇元屋村委会细王坡村9号，开设了一个猪皮、鱿鱼的非法加工点。被告人姚扬业从市场上收购回猪皮、鱿鱼作为生产原料，然后由其雇请的工人檀雪梅、梁思梦，在加工猪皮、鱿鱼的过程中，使用非食品原料过氧化氢（俗称双氧水）进行浸泡，加工完成后，被告人姚扬业再将猪皮、鱿鱼销售给顾客。2014年10月15日上午，灵山县食品药品监督管理局执法人员查处了该猪皮、鱿鱼非法加工点，执法人员从现场查获干鱿鱼147千克；半成品猪皮126千克；成品猪皮41千克；一桶过氧化氢H2O2/27.5%的可疑溶液22.5千克；一桶食用消毒剂（过氧化氢）35%的可疑溶液27千克。经对被缴的可疑溶液抽样送到广西出入境检验检疫局检验检疫技术中心检验，检出过氧化氢成份分别为34.5%和44.2%（检测依据：GB/T23499-2009）。

2014年10月17日，灵山县食品药品监督管理局将案件移交灵山县公安局处理，公安机关立案侦查后，于2014年10月23日电话通知被告人姚扬业到指定地点接受调查，被告人姚扬业按时到达，到案后如实交待其生产、销售有毒、有害食品的主要犯罪事实。当日，被告人姚扬业被灵山县公安局刑事拘留。

另查明，被告人姚扬业经营的猪皮、鱿鱼加工点没有办理食品生产许可证。被告人姚扬业用于浸泡猪皮、鱿鱼的过氧化氢是从南宁市大成化工有限责任公司玉林市分公司购进。

（二）裁判结果

广西壮族自治区钦州市灵山县人民法院经审理认为，被告人姚扬业为牟利，在生产、销售食品中掺入有毒、有害的非食品原料，持续时间较长，被告人的行为已触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百四十四条的规定，构成生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪。公诉机关指控应当以生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪追究被告人姚扬业的刑事责任成立。被告人姚扬业在其犯罪行为已被公安机关发觉，但尚未被采取强制措施的情况下，按照公安机关指定的时间到指定的地点接受调查，可视为自动投案，到案后直至庭审过程中均如实供述其生产、销售有毒、有害食品的主要犯罪事实，属自首，依法可以对被告人姚扬业从轻或减轻处罚。

关于被告人姚扬业及其辩护人认为被告人姚扬业犯罪情节轻微，被查获时已停止生产是犯罪中止，建议法院对被告人姚扬业适用免予刑事处罚的意见。经查，被告人姚扬业从2013年6月份起开始从事食品加工，至案发已有一年多，持续时间较长，销售的对象为不特定的多数人，被告人姚扬业被抓当天不生产不能构成犯罪中止。因此，对被告人姚扬业及其辩护人的上述意见，本院不予采纳。根据被告人姚扬业的犯罪事实、性质、情节和对社会的危害程度，结合本案的具体案情，本院决定对被告人姚扬业从轻处罚并适用缓刑，但在缓刑期限内禁止其从事食品生产。依照法律规定，以生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪判处被告人姚扬业有期徒刑二年，缓刑三年，并处罚金人民币30000元；禁止被告人姚扬业在缓刑考验期限内从事食品生产。宣判后，被告人姚扬业没有上诉，公诉人没有抗诉。判决现已发生法律效力。

（三）典型意义

食品安全问题是人民群众最为关心的一件事。鱿鱼、猪皮都是人民群众最为常吃的食品，这些常用食品的不合格对人身及家庭容易造成巨大精神伤害与痛苦，在社会上易引发恐慌情绪，危害极大，更是从严惩治的重点。在本案中，被告人姚扬业生产的食品没有造成人身伤害，也没有大面积暴发，对其可以从轻处罚。其有自首情节，法院遂作出上述判决。

十一、麻秀龙生产销售有毒有害食品案

（一）基本案情

2012年8月起，被告人麻秀龙从广西百色市、宾阳县收购废弃固体牛油，销售给重庆邦明食品有限公司。为进一步精炼提高售价，2013年3月某日，被告人麻秀龙委托广西莫老爷食品有限公司加工提炼牛油。同年4月中旬，麻秀龙雇车将150吨的牛油运至广西莫老爷食品有限公司的工厂进行加工。2013年5月24日，办案民警从麻秀龙租用的仓库缴获牛油57.9吨，从广西莫老爷食品有限公司的工厂缴获牛油约126吨。经检验，查获的牛油不符合《食用动物油脂卫生标准》。

（二）裁判结果

南宁市西乡塘区人民法院经审理认为，被告人麻秀龙利用非食品原料生产、加工食品并予以销售，其行为已构成生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪。但麻秀龙在利用非食品原料加工食品过程中尚未加工完成即被公安机关查处，是犯罪未遂，可以比照既遂犯从轻或者减轻处罚。麻秀龙归案后如实供述自己的罪行，可以从轻处罚。依照刑法有关规定，以生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪判处被告人麻秀龙有期徒刑二年，并处罚金人民币五万元。

（三）典型意义

生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪对犯罪行为作出了严厉的规定，且在“史上最严厉食品安全法”出台实施的大背景下，犯罪行为依然屡禁不止。除了有犯罪分子牟取暴利、投机取巧的心理，更与我国食品安全监管体系处罚力度较轻等有关。本案对被告人麻秀龙判处有期徒刑二年，并处罚金人民币五万元的处罚，彰显了我国司法机关依法严厉打击、遏制一切形式危害人们舌尖上的安全的决心。

十二、邱某某生产、销售有毒、有害食品案

（一）基本案情

2014年10月至今，被告人邱某某在昭平县昭平综合市场3幢7号门面经营“小美”面包店。2015年6月25日，昭平县食品药品监督管理局对该店生产、销售的面包、馒头进行抽检。同年7月2日，昭平县食品药品监督管理局工作人员将面包、馒头含铝的鉴定结论明确告知了邱某某(由邱某某母亲吴桂群签字)，并对其送达了《国家卫生计生委等5部门调整含铝食品添加剂使用规定的公告》(2014年第8号)(由邱某某母亲签字)。2015年7月3日，邱某某在明知告知事由后继续使用含铝的食品添加剂“泡打粉”生产包子，违反了国家卫计委等5部门公告中“膨化食品生产中不得使用含铝食品添加剂，小麦粉及其制品生产中不得使用硫酸铝钾”的规定，危害了消费者的身体健康。  

（二）裁判结果

广西贺州市昭平县人民法院认为，被告人邱某某在生产、销售的食品中掺入有毒、有害的非食品原料，其行为已触犯《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百四十四条的规定，构成生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪。公诉机关指控被告人犯生产销售有毒、有害食品罪成立。被告人邱某某辩解其行为不构成犯罪，缺乏理据，本院不予采信。为打击刑事犯罪，维护社会秩序，根据被告人的犯罪事实、性质、情节和对社会的危害程度，依照《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百四十四条、第五十二条、第五十三条及《最高人民法院关、最高人民检察院关于办理危害食品安全刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》第九条第一款、第二十条第(三)项之规定，被告人邱某某犯生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪，判处有期徒刑八个月，并处罚金人民币五千元。

（三）典型意义

长期以来，“泡打粉”是生产面包的必用食品添加剂，而且使用广泛。《国家卫生计生委等5部门调整含铝食品添加剂使用规定的公告》规定，自2014年7月1日起，“膨化食品生产中不得使用含铝食品添加剂，小麦粉及其制品生产中不得使用硫酸铝钾”。“泡打粉”就是含铝的食品添加剂。国家禁止使用“泡打粉”生产包子，如果再继续使用，就是犯罪行为，必须予以严厉打击。

十三、张益祥、张庆裕、农秀勤生产、销售有毒、有害食品案

（一）基本案情

2012年11月以来，被告人张益祥、张庆裕、农秀勤三人在南宁市良庆区银海大道景华路东145号左侧自建房内使用过氧化氢（俗称“双氧水”）加工牛百叶、牛肚等食品，加工好后由被告人张益祥销售至广西柳州、贺州等地及贵州省。2013年5月15日公安人员从张益祥的加工点内查获到白色成品牛黄喉1074.4公斤、白色半成品牛黄喉334公斤、白色半成品牛百叶243.1公斤、白色成品牛百叶215.1公斤、白色成品牛肚583公斤、白色半成品牛肚321公斤、黑色成品牛百叶218.7公斤、黑色半成品牛百叶206.4公斤、原料牛百叶150公斤、工业烧碱20斤及记账本（两本）等物品。经广西产品质量监督检验研究院对从被告人张益祥加工点提取的食品及加工用原料进行过氧化氢含量分析，其中编号G13-002652的牛百叶浸泡水、编号G13-002654的牛黄喉浸泡水不符合GB2760-2011要求，从编号G13-002744不明液体中检出过氧化氢。

（二）裁判结果

广西壮族自治区南宁市良庆区人民法院审理认为，被告人张益祥、张庆裕、农秀勤在生产、销售的食品中掺入有毒有害的非食品原料，其行为均已构成生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪。判处被告人张益祥有期徒刑九个月，并处罚金人民币5000元；判处被告人张庆裕有期徒刑八个月，并处罚金人民币5000元；判处被告人农秀勤有期徒刑八个月，并处罚金人民币3000元。2014年1月9日，该院对本案当庭作出判决，目前判决已生效。

(三)典型意义

双氧水学名过氧化氢，是一种化学药品，也是被禁食品添加剂之一。食品经过双氧水浸泡后，原有营养成分被破坏。食用这些食物对人体有害，可损伤胃黏膜，甚至致癌。被告人使用对人体有害并具有强烈刺激性气味的工业过氧化氢（俗称“双氧水”）与氢氧化钠（俗称“烧碱”）浸泡加工牛百叶、牛肚、黄喉等食物，并销售到广西区内各个市县的超市、餐馆以及烧烤、夜宵摊位。经过公开审理，根据案件查明的事实与经过质证的证据，最终案件的被告人的行为被认定构成生产、销售有毒、有害食品罪，被判处有期徒刑，并处罚金，有力地保障和维护了广大百姓的食品安全。

十四、张佳章销售不符合安全标准的食品案

（一）基本案情

2011年的一天，被告人张佳章为谋取利益，在卖猪肉回家途中的江边捡了一头死因不明的母猪，并将该死猪运输到浦北县张黄镇世聪广场卖给一不知名男人，得款100元。

2012年8月9日11时许，被告人张佳章为谋取利益，在浦北县龙门镇岭岗湖路口桥底下捡了一头死因不明的小猪，将死猪运输到浦北县张黄镇贩卖，在运输途中被公安机关抓获。经广西动物疫病预防控制中心检验，从查获的死猪中检出猪瘟病毒（一类动物疫病）、猪繁殖和呼吸综合征（蓝耳病）病毒核酸（二类动物疫病）。

（二）裁判结果

广西壮族自治区浦北县人民法院经审理认为，被告人张佳章为谋取利益，销售死因不明的畜类动物，其行为触犯了《中华人民共和国刑法》第一百四十三条之规定，构成销售不符合安全标准的食品罪。公诉机关指控的罪名成立，本院予以支持，应当以销售不符合安全标准的食品罪追究其刑事责任。被告人张佳章归案后如实供述自己的罪行，依法可以从轻处罚。依据刑法有关规定，以销售不符合安全标准的食品罪判处被告人张佳章判处拘役三个月，并处罚金人民币二千元。张佳章对一审判决服判。

（三）典型意义

本案是在农村、特别是经济欠发达地区农村时有发生案件。本案的发生反映出一些人因收入低，存在贪图小便宜、漠视食品安全、法律观念淡薄的心理，自我管理水平也不高，对不符合安全标准的食品的处理方式方法不当，对非法销售不符合安全标准的食品行为的社会危害性认识不足。本案的依法审理，对于提高公民食品安全意识及遵纪守法意识，依法经营等具有重大意义。

Theme Education Activity on "Promoting Justice and Building Core Values through Openness"

Typical cases of cracking down on illegal crimes that endanger food and drug safety

catalogue

1. The case of Guangxi Hualian Comprehensive Supermarket Co., Ltd. selling food that does not meet safety standards

2. Case of Tao Changxing and others producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards

3. Xu Binghua's case of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards

4. Case of Huang Ning, Zeng Rongfen, and Liu Xuwang selling counterfeit and inferior products

5. Xie Tian and Li Huachun's case of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards

6. The case of Zhao Banghe producing and selling toxic and harmful food

7. Cases of Liu Xiqiang and others producing and selling counterfeit (sesame oil) products and bribing non-state workers

8. Case of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards

9. Case of Sangmou Producing and Selling Fake and Inferior Products

10. Yao Yangye's production and sales of toxic and harmful food cases

11. Ma Xiulong's production and sales of toxic and harmful food cases

12. Case of Qiu producing and selling toxic and harmful food

13. Cases of Zhang Yixiang, Zhang Qingyu, and Nong Xiuqin Producing and Selling Toxic and Harmful Foods

14. Case of Zhang Jiazhang selling food that does not meet safety standards

1、 Case of Guangxi Hualian Comprehensive Supermarket Co., Ltd. Selling Food that Does Not Meet Safety Standards

（1） Basic facts of the case

On April 23, 2014, Ye Runjun purchased 7 cans of pre packaged food made on November 20, 2013, with a shelf life of 18 months, from Guangxi Hualian Comprehensive Supermarket (hereinafter referred to as Hualian Supermarket). Each can cost 73 yuan and a total cost of 511 yuan. Later, Ye Runjun discovered that the body of the Camellia mushroom he purchased was covered with dead and live insects. Ye Runjun repeatedly negotiated with Hualian Supermarket to request a refund and compensation, but the two sides were unable to reach a consensus. Ye Runjun subsequently filed a lawsuit with the People's Court of Jiangnan District, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, requesting Hualian Supermarket to refund the purchase price of 511 yuan and pay a compensation of 5110 yuan ten times the price.

（2） Judgment results

After trial, the court found that Ye Runjun purchased 7 cans of pre packaged food of Shinong tea and mushroom from Hualian Supermarket, and the relationship between the two parties was established, legal and valid. Article 3 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that "food producers and operators shall engage in production and business activities in accordance with laws, regulations, and food safety standards, be responsible to society and the public, ensure food safety, accept social supervision, and assume social responsibility", which is a relevant provision regarding the product quality responsibility and obligation of sellers. Food sellers should not only review the qualification and qualification certificates of food, but also ensure food safety. In this case, it can be observed with the naked eye that there are dead and live insects on the camellia mushroom bodies sold by Hualian Supermarket, and there are also dead insects at the bottom of packaging bottles. Therefore, the camellia mushroom sold by Hualian Supermarket does not meet food safety standards. Hualian Supermarket does not recognize the defense opinion that the camellia mushrooms it sells meet food safety standards, and Hualian Supermarket does not knowingly sell them without meeting food safety standards. According to Article 96 of the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, consumers who produce food that does not meet food safety standards or knowingly sell food that does not meet food safety standards may not only demand compensation for losses, but also demand compensation of ten times the price from the producer or seller. Therefore, Ye Runjun's lawsuit requesting Hualian Supermarket to refund the payment and pay ten times the compensation for the goods was supported by the court.

（3） Typical significance

According to the provisions of China's Food Safety Law, food safety refers to food that is non-toxic, harmless, meets the necessary nutritional requirements, and does not cause any acute, subacute, or chronic harm to human health. Food sellers have a legal obligation to ensure food safety and should promptly clean and remove food that does not meet safety standards. In this case, the failure of Hualian Supermarket to timely clean and remove the camellia mushrooms sold as long worms from the shelves is a violation of legal obligations and should be considered as selling food that knowingly does not meet food safety standards. In this case, consumers can claim compensation for both losses and ten times the price, or they can only claim compensation for ten times the price. Ye Runjun's request for Hualian Supermarket to refund the payment and pay compensation ten times the selling price is supported by the law. After the judgment, Hualian Supermarket did not appeal.

2、 Case of Tao Changxing and others producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards

（1） Basic facts of the case

Since 2013, the defendants Zhou Mingzhong, Li Xiongmei, and Wen Shaoming (dealt with separately) have purchased pigs from surrounding counties and towns in Nanning City without business qualifications and quarantine by the health inspection and quarantine department for illegal benefits. Among them, Zhou Mingzhong and Li Xiongmei sliced and sold the purchased pigs at Room 431, Renmin Road North Yili, Xingning District, Nanning City. Defendants Yao Shoulin and Tang Yukui assisted Wen Shaoming at 247 Renmin Road North Yili, Xingning District, Nanning City, by dividing and selling the pigs purchased by Wen Shaoming with unknown causes of death or illness.

On January 17, 2014, the Ministry of Industry and Commerce, in conjunction with the public security organs, seized 1932 kilograms of suspected diseased and dead pork purchased by Zhou Mingzhong and Li Xiongmei in Room 431, North Yili, Renmin Road, Xingning District, Nanning City, and 1218 kilograms of suspected diseased and dead pork purchased by Wen Shaoming and cut by Yao Shoulin and Tang Yukui in Room 247, North Yili, Renmin Road, Xingning District, Nanning City. And arrested the defendants Zhou Mingzhong, Li Xiongmei, Yao Shoulin, and Tang Yukui. After identification, pseudorabies virus, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (blue ear disease) virus nucleic acid, highly pathogenic pig blue ear disease virus nucleic acid, and porcine circovirus were detected positive in two seized pork samples.

It was also found that since December 2011, the defendants Tao Changxing, Huang Yanling, and Tao Guoyan, in order to seek illegal benefits, successively purchased pork from "Feiying", Zhou Mingzhong, and Wen Shaoming that had died of unknown or diseased causes. The defendant Tao Guoyan drove the pork back to the rented house of Tao Changxing and others at 23 Yanziling Shangliu Lane, Xingning District, Nanning City, The three people jointly processed the purchased pork into barbecue and sold it to Shihu Guilin rice noodle Store in Nanning. According to the accounting, only from October 28, 2013 to January 25, 2014, 6702 jin of barbecue was sold to Shihu Rice noodles Store, with the amount of 125735 yuan.

（2） Judgment results

After trial, the Xingning District People's Court of Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region found that the defendants Tao Changxing, Zhou Mingzhong, Huang Yanling, Tao Guoyan, Li Xiongmei, Yao Shoulin, and Tang Yukui purchased dead pigs with unknown causes of death or illness for processing, and made them into food for external sales. According to the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Laws in Handling Criminal Cases Involving Food Safety Hazards, livestock, poultry, animals, aquatic animals and their meat and meat products that die from illness, have unknown causes of death, or fail inspection and quarantine shall be deemed as "capable of causing serious food poisoning accidents or other serious foodborne diseases" as stipulated in Article 143 of the Criminal Law, Constitute the crime of producing or selling food that does not meet safety standards. Therefore, the actions of the seven defendants in this case have all violated the provisions of Article 143 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, constituting the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards. Based on this, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law, the defendant Tao Changxing was sentenced to five years in prison and a fine of 200000 yuan for the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards; The defendant Tao Guoyan was sentenced to four years in prison and a fine of RMB 100000 for the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards; The defendant Huang Yanling was sentenced to three years in prison and a fine of RMB 90000 for the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards; The defendant Zhou Mingzhong was sentenced to three years in prison and a fine of RMB 90000 for the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards; The defendant Li Xiongmei was sentenced to two years and two months in prison for the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards, and was also fined RMB 50000; The defendant Yao Shoulin was sentenced to two years in prison and a fine of RMB 30000 for the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards; Tang Yukui, the defendant, was sentenced to two years in prison and a fine of 30000 yuan for the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards.

（3） Typical significance

This case is a case with a wide social impact and involves food safety for the people. Nanning Shihu Guilin rice noodle is a famous local Rice noodles brand with a certain influence, and Rice noodles is also a favorite food of local people. In today's world where food safety issues are frequent and food safety is increasingly valued, there are still criminals who use substandard raw materials or incorporate illegal additives in the food production process to seek illegal benefits, disregarding the high-pressure policy of the country towards food safety crimes, and making money without realizing their intentions. The people's court has comprehensively considered the criminal facts, nature, circumstances, and harmful consequences of Tao Changxing, Tao Guoyan, Huang Yanling, Zhou Mingzhong, Li Xiongmei, Yao Shoulin, and Tang Yukui's production and sale of food that does not meet safety standards, and sentenced the seven individuals to fixed-term imprisonment of two to five years and a fine ranging from 30000 to 200000 yuan, in accordance with the principle of consistent criminal responsibility and punishment.

3、 Xu Binghua's case of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards

（1） Basic facts of the case

The defendant Xu Binghua runs and manages the Guilin rice noodle Store in Shihu, Nanning City and is responsible for the purchase of food materials. When purchasing food materials, Xu Binghua did not require Tao Changxing and others to provide relevant certificates such as business license, food circulation certificate, health certificate, etc., and ordered the barbecue made of pork that died of illness or unknown cause of death from Tao Changxing for the production and sales of barbecue powder at a long-term low price from the end of 2011, Provide barbecue powder to customers for consumption. According to the appraisal, during the period from October 28, 2013 to January 25, 2014, Nanning Shihu Guilin rice noodle Store ordered 6702 jin of barbecue from Tao Changxing, valued at 125735 yuan. The defendant Xu Binghua instructed Nong Yongqing, an employee, to fill in false information in the Acceptance Account of Food Raw Materials Purchased by Catering Units of Shihu Rice noodles Shop for the spot check of Nanning Food and Drug Administration.

（2） Judgment results

After trial, the Xingning District People's Court of Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region found that the defendant Xu Binghua's purchase of pork barbecue made from unknown or diseased pork for the production of barbecue powder, sold to customers for consumption, and had other serious circumstances. His behavior violated Article 143 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and constituted the crime of producing and selling food that did not meet safety standards. Based on this, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law, the defendant Xu Binghua was sentenced to five years in prison and a fine of RMB 200000 for the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards.

（3） Typical significance

This case is a case with a wide social impact and involves food safety for the people. Nanning Shihu Guilin rice noodle is a famous local Rice noodles brand with a certain influence, and Rice noodles is also a favorite food of local people. In today's world where food safety issues are frequent and food safety is increasingly valued, there are still criminals who use substandard raw materials or incorporate illegal additives in the food production process to seek illegal benefits, disregarding the high-pressure policy of the country towards food safety crimes, and making money without realizing their intentions. The people's court comprehensively considered the facts, nature, circumstances, and harmful consequences of Xu Binghua's crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards, and sentenced him to five years in prison and a fine of RMB 200000 in accordance with the law, which is consistent with the principle of criminal responsibility and punishment.

4、 Case of Huang Ning, Zeng Rongfen, and Liu Xuwang Selling Counterfeit and Inferior Products

（1） Basic facts of the case

The defendant Huang Ning is the legal representative of Liuzhou Dapeng Agricultural Means Co., Ltd., which mainly deals in pesticides, seeds, fertilizers, etc. The defendants Zeng Rongfen and Liu Xuwang have a marital relationship. In 2009, the couple established the Xiangzhou Maping Xuwang Agricultural Materials Management Department by injecting capital at No. 5 Maping New Street, Maping Town, Xiangzhou County. The owner is Zeng Rongfen, and their business scope includes pesticides, fertilizers, and seeds. Normally, Liu Xuwang is responsible for purchasing and Zeng Rongfen is responsible for sales. In December 2012, the defendant Huang Ning purchased the "long-term system" from Zhengzhou Wan'an Te Agrochemical Products Co., Ltd ®” 2% imidacloprid pesticide, knowing that it is suitable for controlling cucumber aphids, in order to increase sales and expand promotion of its suitability for controlling sugarcane pests, sold 202 pieces of "long made" at a price of 370 yuan per piece ®” 2% imidacloprid pesticide was provided to Maping Xuwang Agricultural Materials Business Department, with a sales revenue of 74740 yuan. Defendants Zeng Rongfen and Liu Xuwang of the Ma Ping Xuwang Agricultural Means Management Department purchased 202 pieces of "long production" from Liuzhou Dapeng Agricultural Means Company ®” After using the 2% imidacloprid pesticide, both of them were subjectively aware of the true performance of the pesticide in controlling aphids on cucumbers. However, in order to increase sales, they promoted the pesticide to farmers as suitable for controlling sugarcane pests. As a result, farmers such as Qin from Dacaotun, Maping Town purchased the pesticide for controlling sugarcane pests, but the sugarcane pests were not killed, causing losses to sugarcane farmers. After investigation, the defendants Zeng Rongfen and Liu Xuwang sold a total of 1512 packages, each priced at 55 yuan, with a total sales revenue of 83160 yuan. Identified by the Pesticide Identification Institute of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, it has been recognized as a "long-term system ®” 2% imidacloprid pesticide is an unqualified product.

（2） Judgment results

The People's Court of Xiangzhou County held that the defendants Huang Ning, Zeng Rongfen, and Liu Xuwang were aware of the "long system ®” 2% imidacloprid pesticide is suitable for the prevention and control of cucumber aphids. However, in order to make profits, the product is widely promoted as a pest control for sugarcane and sold to sugarcane farmers for spraying sugarcane pests. Its behavior is to pass it off as genuine, and the sales amount is above 50000 yuan, which has violated the criminal law and constitutes the crime of selling fake and inferior products. The defendant Huang Ning, as the legal representative of Liuzhou Dapeng Agricultural Means Co., Ltd. invested by a natural person, shall be responsible for the sales amount of the company. The defendants Zeng Rongfen and Liu Xuwang, in the sale of counterfeit and substandard products, one person is responsible for purchasing and the other person is responsible for selling. They cooperate with each other and are both joint offenders. They should be punished according to all the crimes they participated in. After the incident, the defendant Huang Ning voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs and truthfully confessed the fact that he sold fake and inferior products, which was a voluntary surrender. According to law, the punishment can be lenient or mitigated. After the defendants Zeng Rongfen and Liu Xuwang were brought to justice, they were able to truthfully confess the fact that they sold fake and inferior products. They voluntarily confessed in court and could be given a lighter punishment according to law. In addition, after the incident, the defendants Zeng Rongfen and Liu Xuwang were able to refund the pesticide payment to the sugarcane farmers, showing a certain degree of repentance. Therefore, the two defendants may be given a lighter punishment at their discretion. Therefore, the defendant Huang Ning was convicted of selling counterfeit and inferior products and sentenced to a fine of RMB 80000; The defendant Zeng Rongfen committed the crime of selling counterfeit and inferior products and was fined RMB 40000; The defendant Liu Xuwang committed the crime of selling counterfeit and inferior products and was fined RMB 40000.

（3） Typical significance

People's livelihood cases are closely related to the survival and development of individual citizens and the basic interests of families. China's judicial authorities have always attached great importance to the sentencing and execution of cases involving people's livelihood. In this case, Huang Ning, Zeng Rongfen, and Liu Xuwang were aware of the "long system ®” 2% imidacloprid pesticide is suitable for the control of cucumber aphids, but in order to make profits, the product is still widely promoted as a pest control for sugarcane and sold to sugarcane farmers for spraying sugarcane pests, ultimately affecting the growth of sugarcane and causing huge losses to sugarcane farmers. The court ruled on this case in accordance with the law, providing legal deterrence to the majority of pesticide merchants. The vivid case warns them not to cause losses to farmers for personal gain, Take the path of illegal and criminal activities on your own.

5、 The case of Xie Tian and Li Huachun producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards

（1） Basic facts of the case

Between the end of November and December 2013, Xie Tian and Li Huachun were hired by others (to be dealt with separately) to purchase and transport dead pigs from Huazhou City, Guangdong Province multiple times by truck back to the meat processing plant in Wanglu Village, Rendong Town, Yuzhou District, Yulin City, for processing and sales by others. On December 23, 2013, Li Huachun and Xie Tian drove a truck to Hejiang Bridge, Hejiang Town, Huazhou City, Guangdong Province to purchase a batch of dead pigs with unknown causes of death and without quarantine by animal health supervision agencies. At around 6:00 the next day, the two of them transported the batch of dead pigs (5.57 tons in total) back to Yulin and were caught by public security police while passing through Xiushui Road in Yuzhou District, Yulin City. After inspection, the dead pig involved in the case contains pseudorabies virus and porcine circovirus.

（2） Judgment results

The original trial court held that Xie Tian and Li Huachun's production and sales of food that did not meet food safety standards were sufficient to cause serious food poisoning accidents or other serious foodborne diseases, and their actions violated the criminal law, constituting the crime of producing and selling food that did not meet safety standards. Xie Tian and Li Huachun jointly committed intentional crimes, which constitutes a joint crime; In the joint crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards, Xie Tian and Li Huachun both play a secondary role and are accomplices, and should be given lighter punishment according to law. After Xie Tian and Li Huachun were brought to justice, they truthfully confessed their crimes and could be given a lighter punishment in accordance with the law. Based on this, the original trial court ruled in accordance with relevant laws: firstly, the defendant Li Huachun committed the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards, and was sentenced to two years and six months in prison, with a fine of 40000 yuan; 2、 The defendant Xie Tian committed the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards and was sentenced to two years and five months in prison, with a fine of 40000 yuan.

Xie Tian appealed that in this case, he was hired by others to purchase and transport dead pigs, and was an accomplice. After returning to the case, he pleaded guilty and had a good attitude. He requested the second instance court to leniently punish him. The Yulin Intermediate People's Court of the second instance believes that the appellant (the original defendant) Xie Tian and the original defendant Li Huachun produce and sell food that does not meet food safety standards, which is sufficient to cause serious food poisoning accidents or other serious foodborne diseases, have violated the criminal law and constitute the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards. Xie Tian and Li Huachun jointly committed intentional crimes, which is a joint crime; In the joint crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards, Xie Tian and Li Huachun both play a secondary role and are accomplices, and should be given lighter punishment according to law. After Xie Tian and Li Huachun were brought to justice, they truthfully confessed their crimes and could be given a lighter punishment in accordance with the law. In summary, the original trial court made a judgment based on the facts of Xie Tian and Li Huachun's crimes, the nature, plot, and degree of harm to society, in accordance with the law. The court found that the facts were clear, the evidence was accurate and sufficient, the conviction was accurate, the sentencing was appropriate, and the application of the law was correct, which should be upheld; Xie Tian's appeal reason is not valid and will be rejected in accordance with the law. In June 2015, the final ruling was made: rejecting the appeal and upholding the original judgment.

（3） Typical significance

The country is people-oriented, the people prioritize food, and food prioritizes safety. The level of food and drug safety is one of the important indicators that determine the living standards and happiness index of the people. Living in an environment that ensures food and drug safety is the right and dignity that the people should have, and it is also the bottom line of the entire society. However, in recent years, incidents such as gutter oil and toxic capsules have emerged in China, repeatedly challenging the bottom line of society in various ways, seriously endangering the physical health and life safety of the people, seriously affecting the national image, and damaging the credibility of the Party and government. The people's court has fully played its role in criminal trial, implemented the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity, and punished cases related to food and drug safety in accordance with the law, effectively ensuring food and drug safety.

6、 Zhao Banghe Production and Sales of Toxic and Harmful Food Case

（1） Basic facts of the case

From 2010 to 2014, the defendant Zhao Banghe operated a small workshop in Jianwei Group, Mubo Village, Jingnan Town, Cangwu County to produce Rolls of dried bean milk creams, and added borax, a non food additive prohibited from adding to food, to the Rolls of dried bean milk creams produced and sold it. On April 25, 2014, the public security personnel seized the small workshop and detained the Rolls of dried bean milk creams and raw soybean milk produced. Upon inspection, borax was detected in the Rolls of dried bean milk creams and raw soybean milk seized.

（2） Judgment results

The People's Court of Cangwu County held that the defendant Zhao Banghe, in violation of the national food management regulations, mixed the poisonous and harmful non food raw material borax into the Rolls of dried bean milk creams and sold it, which constituted a crime of producing and selling poisonous and harmful food. According to the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law, the defendant Zhao Banghe was sentenced to one year in prison, suspended for one year and six months, and fined RMB 5000 for the crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food.

（3） Typical significance

The production and sale of toxic and harmful food cases were previously subject to strict sentencing standards, mainly based on whether there were serious consequences such as food poisoning that constituted a crime. After the promulgation of the Criminal Law Amendment (8), the punishment for the production and sale of toxic and harmful food was increased. As long as there were acts of producing and selling harmful food, it constituted a crime and criminal responsibility should be pursued. In this case, despite the small amount of prohibited food additives added by the defendant, there were no serious consequences. But food producers must ensure food safety and avoid tragedies. At the same time, as consumers, we should keep our eyes open, be good at identifying hazardous foods, learn more about food safety related knowledge and relevant laws and regulations, dare to say "no" to food hazardous behaviors, and jointly create a good food safety environment.

7、 Cases of Liu Xiqiang and others producing and selling counterfeit (sesame oil) products and bribing non-state workers

（1） Basic facts of the case

In 2006, the defendants Liu Xiqiang and Guo Xiubo jointly invested to establish Harbin Xiqiang Seasoning Co., Ltd. In order to reduce production costs and seek illegal interests, the two people purchased sesame oil essence and crude cottonseed oil from the defendant Xue Xianmin, and instructed the defendant Tang Changyou and others to mix sesame oil essence, crude cottonseed oil and salad oil into fake sesame oil, or mixed fake sesame oil into sesame oil in a certain proportion, and sold after filling and packaging, with a sales amount of more than 10 million yuan. In August 2012, Liu Xiqiang mixed purchased maltose syrup into honey to make fake and inferior honey for sale, with a sales amount of over 200000 yuan. Liu Xiqiang, in order to sell fake and inferior sesame oil produced by Tian Shou Company's Second Factory and Tian Shou Company's Dumpling Factory, instructed others to bribe Cao Yan, a purchaser of Tian Shou Company's Second Factory, and Yu Guang, the director of Tian Shou Company's Dumpling Factory (to be dealt with separately) for more than 40000 yuan according to the sales quantity,

（2） Judgment results

The first instance judgment of the Intermediate People's Court of Suihua City found that the defendant Liu Xiqiang was guilty of the crime of producing and selling counterfeit and inferior products, and was sentenced to fifteen years in prison with a fine of RMB 6 million. The defendant was also convicted of bribery against non-state personnel, and was sentenced to two years in prison. The defendant was sentenced to sixteen years in prison with a fine of RMB 6 million; The defendant Xue Xianmin committed the crime of producing counterfeit and inferior products and was sentenced to eight years in prison, with a fine of 500000 yuan; The defendants Tang Changyou and Guo Xiubo were sentenced to criminal penalties for the crime of producing fake and inferior products and the crime of selling fake and inferior products. After the verdict was pronounced, Liu Xiqiang and Xue Xianmin appealed. After trial, the Higher People's Court of Heilongjiang Province ruled to dismiss the appeal and uphold the original judgment.

（3） Typical significance

This case is a typical criminal case of producing and selling counterfeit and inferior products. The four defendants, in order to seek illegal benefits, mixed and adulterated the production of sesame oil and honey, using substandard and fake products as genuine ones, and sold them. The amount involved in the case was huge, seriously infringing on the national supervision and management system for product quality and the legitimate rights and interests of consumers. Liu Xiqiang bribed non-state workers in order to gain a competitive advantage, which also violated the normal business activities and fair competition order of the enterprise. The occurrence of such criminal acts seriously infringes on the quality and integrity of enterprise products, which is detrimental to the evaluation of the economic and social development environment, and must be severely punished in accordance with the law.

8、 A case of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards

（1） Basic facts of the case

Starting from January 2012, the defendant Tu Mou opened the "Jiawu Haier Fast Food" at the intersection of Gulebag Township, Zepu Town, Zepu County without completing relevant procedures, engaged in the sales of boiled (roasted) chicken. On July 25th, the 15 raw chickens stored in the refrigerator went bad (rotten). The defendant violated the national food hygiene management regulations and knowingly cooked (marinated) (roasted) the 15 spoiled raw chicken and other chicken in the refrigerator before selling them to customers. From the morning of July 25th to 18:00 on July 26th, 53 customers purchased 57 spoiled roasted chickens, causing 193 people including Gu to be poisoned after consumption, and resulting in the poisoning and death of two people, Gu and Ah.

After forensic examination and identification of the body, it is believed that the deceased Gu and A experienced systemic poisoning symptoms due to consuming food contaminated with Salmonella typhi (chicken) during their lifetime. Eventually, they suffered from water and electrolyte disorders, acute respiratory failure, and died after ineffective rescue efforts. After inspection and testing by the Kashgar Regional Center for Disease Control and Prevention, it was found that both the defendant Tuo and the victim, including Tuo and Ai, had Salmonella typhi in their bodies.

（2） Judgment results

The People's Court of Zepu County believes that the defendant, Tu Mou, disregarded national laws and social morality and knowingly cooked (braised) (grilled) spoiled chicken that did not meet hygiene standards before selling it. As a result, two people died of severe food poisoning and 193 people were poisoned to varying degrees, resulting in a food safety incident with particularly serious consequences and a serious violation of citizens' personal rights. His behavior constitutes production The crime of selling food that does not meet safety standards should be severely punished in accordance with the law. However, the defendant and the plaintiff in the incidental civil litigation have reached a civil compensation mediation agreement, obtained the understanding of the victim, and have shown profound repentance. Therefore, on the basis of considering these aspects, the defendant can be appropriately given a lighter punishment within the legal penalty range. The criminal facts and charges charged by the public prosecution organs can be established, and this court supports them in accordance with the law, and can adopt the sentencing suggestions of the public prosecution organs. The court ruled in accordance with the law that the defendant committed the crime of producing and selling food that does not meet safety standards, and was sentenced to 11 years in prison, with a fine of 10000 yuan and deprivation of political rights for 2 years. The judgment has taken legal effect.

（3） Typical significance

Food is the top priority for the people. Food and drug safety is related to the physical health and life safety of the people, as well as economic development and social harmony. In recent years, some major and malignant food safety incidents in China have been continuous, with a series of cases including clenbuterol, toxic milk powder, toxic bean sprouts, gutter oil, problematic capsules, and sick and dead pork appearing one after another, indicating that the current food safety situation in society is not optimistic. Faced with this situation, the people's court has always made efforts to fulfill its functions and protect the safety of people's lives and property in accordance with the law. It has played a heavy role in criminal activities related to food and drug safety, resolutely cracked down on the arrogance of illegal elements, enhanced the sense of responsibility for ensuring people's livelihoods, demonstrated the deterrent and deterrent power of socialist justice, and promoted social integrity.

9、 Case of Sangmou Producing and Selling Fake and Inferior Products

（1） Basic facts of the case

In late November 2007, the defendant Xu successively purchased the oil sunflower seeds claimed to be "303" from Lu Yanhua, a staff member of Jifeng Company in Changji City. In the spring of 2008, Xu (who had been sentenced to 11 years in prison for selling fake and inferior seeds) sold the oil sunflower seeds in Jiete Agashi Village, Kuostek Township, Burjin County. The village villagers and 21 neighboring villagers, including Gao, purchased 1683 kilograms of oil sunflower seeds claimed to be "303" from Xu through direct or transfer. 21 victims planted a total of 2630 acres of oil sunflowers and paid a seed fee of 99885 yuan. During the growth period of oil sunflowers, Gao and other affected farmers found that the phenomenon of oil sunflower branching was very serious, so they jointly applied to the Burqin County Seed Station to identify the oil sunflower seeds they planted. On September 6, 2008, after expert appraisal, it was determined that the oil sunflower seeds planted by the affected farmers were fake seeds. On September 25, 2008, the affected farmers applied for expert field assessment and appraisal. After expert appraisal, the oil sunflower yield planted by the affected farmers, such as Gao, lost 337000 kilograms, with a total value of RMB 1213200. On May 21, 2009, after being identified by the Xinjiang Agriculture and Forestry Judicial Appraisal Institute, the production of oil sunflowers planted by the affected farmers such as Gao lost 339700 kilograms, with a unit price of 3.10 yuan and a total value of 1053070 yuan. Among them, the defendant Sang (Xu's wife) jointly sold 445 kilograms of counterfeit 303 sunflower seeds with Xu in this case, with a sales amount of 25070 yuan. The victim's farmers suffered economic losses of 344437.35 yuan due to crop failure and reduction.

It was also found that 19 plaintiffs in the incidental civil litigation have received compensation of 516000 yuan, of which the defendant Xu compensated 100000 yuan and the criminal Xu compensated 16000 yuan.

（2） Judgment results

The first instance judgment of the People's Court of Burqin County and the second instance judgment of the Intermediate People's Court of Altay District believe that the defendant Xu and the criminal Xu jointly sold counterfeit "303" oil sunflower seeds without labels, causing the victim farmers to suffer a particularly significant economic loss of 1044700 yuan due to reduced production, seriously damaging the national supervision and management system for seed quality, and their behavior directly harmed agricultural production, which has constituted the crime of selling fake and inferior seeds. The prosecution charges the defendant Xu with clear criminal facts and sufficient evidence, and the charges are supported by this court. In this case, the defendant Sang and Xu jointly sold counterfeit "303" sunflower seeds. The defendant Sang participated in the sale of counterfeit "303" sunflower seeds, resulting in a significant economic loss of 344437.35 yuan for the victim's farmers due to reduced production. His behavior has constituted the crime of selling fake and inferior seeds. The prosecution charges the defendant Sang with clear criminal facts and sufficient evidence, and the charges are supported by this court. The defendant, Xu, played a major role in the joint crime and was the principal offender, and should be punished according to all the crimes he participated in. The defense opinion that his defender is an accessory will not be accepted. The defendant, Xu, voluntarily surrendered to the public security organs before discovering the facts of his crime and truthfully confessed the facts of the crime, which is considered voluntary surrender and may be given a lighter punishment. The defense opinion that the defendant Xu surrendered himself was adopted by his defender. The defendant, Xu, has compensated the victim with a loss of 100000 yuan and has shown some remorse. He may be given a lighter punishment as appropriate. The defendant, Sang, played a secondary role in the crime of selling fake and inferior seeds and was an accessory, and should be given a lighter punishment. The defendant, Mr. Sang, voluntarily compensated the victim for some economic losses and showed some repentance. He may be given a lighter punishment as appropriate. According to the criminal facts, nature, and circumstances of the defendant Sang in this case, the application of probation will no longer harm society, and can be applied to him. Based on this, the court ruled in accordance with the law that the defendant Xu committed the crime of selling fake and inferior seeds and was sentenced to seven years in prison, with a fine of 98885.00 yuan. The defendant, Sang, committed the crime of selling fake and inferior seeds and was sentenced to three years' imprisonment, four years' probation, and a fine of 25070 yuan. The counterfeit "303" oil sunflower seed seal sample will be confiscated. After the judgment came into effect, the defendant Xu compensated the plaintiff in the incidental civil litigation, such as Gao, for a loss of 489640 yuan, and assumed joint and several liability for compensation. After the judgment came into effect, the defendant Sang assumed joint and several liability for the compensation of the plaintiff Gao and other oil sunflowers for the above-mentioned incidental civil litigation by the criminal Xu. After the judgment came into effect, the defendants Xu and Sang bore joint and several liability for the criminal Xu's compensation for the incidental civil litigation, including 19 plaintiffs Gao, who incurred appraisal fees of 5000 yuan, litigation fees of 7787.40 yuan, and transportation fees of 3000 yuan.

（3） Typical significance

The quality of agricultural seeds is closely related to the vital interests of farmers and the safety of agricultural grain production. The vicious criminal behavior of a few lawless individuals selling counterfeit and inferior seeds in today's society has greatly harmed the enthusiasm of farmers for production, and even led to the destruction of farmers' families, with a negative impact. The people's court has always adhered to strict punishment in accordance with the law for such criminal acts, and will never tolerate or adopt a high-pressure posture towards those who commit such crimes, forming a deterrent effect. It aims to eliminate evil, protect the legitimate rights and interests of the people, and maintain a clean and upright legal environment.

10、 Yao Yangye's Case of Producing and Selling Toxic and Harmful Food

（1） Basic facts of the case

Since June 2013, the defendant Yao Yangye has opened an illegal processing site for pig skin and squid at No. 9 Xiwangpo Village, Yuanwu Village Committee, Xinwei Town, Lingshan County. The defendant Yao Yangye purchased pig skin and squid from the market as production raw materials, and then hired workers Tan Xuemei and Liang Simeng to soak them in non food raw material hydrogen peroxide (commonly known as hydrogen peroxide) during the processing of pig skin and squid. After the processing is completed, the defendant Yao Yangye then sold the pig skin and squid to customers. On the morning of October 15, 2014, law enforcement officers from the Lingshan County Food and Drug Administration investigated and dealt with the illegal processing site of pig skin and squid. Law enforcement officers seized 147 kilograms of dried squid from the scene; 126 kilograms of semi-finished pig skin; 41 kilograms of finished pig skin; 22.5 kilograms of a suspicious solution of hydrogen peroxide H2O2/27.5% in a barrel; 27 kilograms of a suspected solution of 35% edible disinfectant (hydrogen peroxide) in a bucket. After sampling the suspicious solution collected and sending it to the Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center of Guangxi Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau for inspection, the hydrogen peroxide content detected was 34.5% and 44.2%, respectively (detection basis: GB/T23499-2009).

On October 17, 2014, the Lingshan County Food and Drug Administration transferred the case to the Lingshan County Public Security Bureau for processing. After the public security organs filed the case for investigation, they notified the defendant Yao Yangye by phone to the designated location for investigation on October 23, 2014. The defendant Yao Yangye arrived on time and truthfully confessed the main criminal facts of producing and selling toxic and harmful food upon arrival. On the same day, the defendant Yao Yangye was criminally detained by the Lingshan County Public Security Bureau.

It was also found that the defendant Yao Yangye did not obtain a food production license for the pig skin and squid processing points he operated. The defendant Yao Yangye purchased hydrogen peroxide used for soaking pig skin and squid from Yulin Branch of Nanning Dacheng Chemical Co., Ltd.

（2） Judgment results

After trial, the People's Court of Lingshan County, Qinzhou City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region found that the defendant Yao Yangye, for profit, mixed toxic and harmful non food raw materials into the production and sale of food for a long period of time. The defendant's behavior has violated Article 144 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and constitutes the crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food. The prosecution charges that the defendant Yao Yangye should be held criminally responsible for the crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food. The defendant Yao Yangye, whose criminal behavior has been discovered by the public security organs but has not yet been subjected to compulsory measures, shall be deemed to have voluntarily surrendered to the investigation at the designated location at the time specified by the public security organs. After arriving at the case and even during the trial, he truthfully confessed to the main criminal facts of producing and selling toxic and harmful food, which is considered voluntary surrender. According to law, the defendant Yao Yangye may be given a lighter or mitigated punishment.

Regarding the defendant Yao Yangye and his defenders' belief that the defendant Yao Yangye committed a minor crime and had stopped production at the time of seizure, it is considered a suspension of the crime. It is recommended that the court apply the opinion of exemption from criminal punishment to the defendant Yao Yangye. After investigation, the defendant Yao Yangye began to engage in food processing in June 2013, and it has been more than a year since the incident, lasting for a long time. The sales target is an unspecified majority of people. The defendant Yao Yangye's failure to produce on the day of his arrest cannot constitute a suspension of the crime. Therefore, the above opinions of the defendant Yao Yangye and his defenders will not be accepted by this court. Based on the criminal facts, nature, circumstances, and degree of harm to society of the defendant Yao Yangye, and taking into account the specific circumstances of this case, this court has decided to impose a lenient punishment on the defendant Yao Yangye and apply a probation, but during the probation period, he is prohibited from engaging in food production. According to the law, the defendant Yao Yangye was sentenced to two years in prison, suspended for three years, and fined RMB 30000 for the crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food; The defendant Yao Yangye is prohibited from engaging in food production during the probation period. After the verdict was pronounced, the defendant Yao Yangye did not appeal, and the prosecutor did not protest. The judgment has now taken legal effect.

（3） Typical significance

The issue of food safety is the most concerning concern of the people. Squid and pig skin are the most commonly consumed foods by the people. The substandard use of these commonly used foods can easily cause significant mental harm and pain to individuals and families, and can easily trigger panic in society, posing great harm. They are also the focus of strict punishment. In this case, the defendant Yao Yangye did not cause personal injury to the food produced and there was no large-scale outbreak, so he can be given a lighter punishment. He surrendered himself, and the court made the above judgment accordingly.

11、 Ma Xiulong's production and sales of toxic and harmful food cases

（1） Basic facts of the case

Starting from August 2012, the defendant Ma Xiulong purchased waste solid butter from Baise City and Binyang County in Guangxi and sold it to Chongqing Bangming Food Co., Ltd. In order to further refine and increase the selling price, on March 2013, the defendant Ma Xiulong entrusted Guangxi Molaoye Food Co., Ltd. to process and extract butter. In mid April of the same year, Ma Xiulong hired a car to transport 150 tons of butter to the factory of Guangxi Molaoye Food Co., Ltd. for processing. On May 24, 2013, police officers seized 57.9 tons of butter from the warehouse rented by Ma Xiulong and approximately 126 tons of butter from the factory of Guangxi Molaoye Food Co., Ltd. After inspection, the discovered butter does not comply with the "Hygienic Standards for Edible Animal Fats".

（2） Judgment results

After trial, the People's Court of Xixiangtang District, Nanning City found that the defendant Ma Xiulong's use of non food raw materials to produce, process, and sell food constitutes the crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food. However, Ma Xiulong was punished by the public security organs for not completing the processing of food using non food raw materials, which is an attempted crime. He can be given a lighter or mitigated punishment compared to the accomplished offender. After Ma Xiulong is brought to justice, he truthfully confesses his crimes and can be given a lighter punishment. According to the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law, the defendant Ma Xiulong was sentenced to two years in prison and a fine of RMB 50000 for the crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food.

（3） Typical significance

The crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food has strict regulations on criminal behavior, and in the context of the implementation of the "strictest food safety law in history", criminal behavior is still repeatedly prohibited. In addition to the mentality of criminals seeking exorbitant profits and opportunism, it is also related to the relatively light punishment of China's food safety regulatory system. This case sentenced the defendant Ma Xiulong to two years in prison and a fine of RMB 50000, demonstrating the determination of China's judicial authorities to crack down on and contain all forms of harm to people's safety in accordance with the law.

12、 Case of Qiu producing and selling toxic and harmful food

（1） Basic facts of the case

Since October 2014, the defendant Qiu has been operating the "Xiaomei" bakery in the 7th storefront of Building 3, Zhaoping Comprehensive Market, Zhaoping County. On June 25, 2015, Zhaoping County Food and Drug Administration conducted a spot check on the bread and Mantou produced and sold by the store. On July 2 of the same year, the staff of Zhaoping County Food and Drug Administration clearly informed Qiu of the identification conclusion of aluminum in bread and Mantou (signed by Qiu's mother, Wu Guiqun), and delivered the Announcement of Five Departments including the National Health and Family Planning Commission on Adjusting the Regulations on the Use of Aluminum containing Food Additives (No. 8 in 2014) (signed by Qiu's mother). On July 3, 2015, Qiu continued to use aluminum containing food additive "bubble baking powder" to produce steamed buns after knowing the reason, violating the regulations of the National Health and Family Planning Commission and other five departments that "aluminum containing food additives are not allowed in the production of puffed food, and aluminum potassium sulfate is not allowed in the production of wheat flour and its products", which is harmful to the health of consumers.

（2） Judgment results

The People's Court of Zhaoping County, Hezhou City, Guangxi believes that the defendant Qiu, who mixed toxic and harmful non food raw materials into the food produced and sold, has violated the provisions of Article 144 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and constitutes the crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food. The prosecution charged the defendant with the crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food. The defendant Qiu argued that his actions did not constitute a crime and lacked evidence, which is not accepted by this court. In order to combat criminal offenses and maintain social order, based on the defendant's criminal facts, nature, circumstances, and degree of harm to society, in accordance with Article 144, Article 52, Article 53 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 9, Paragraph 1 of the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases Involving Food Safety Hazards According to the provisions of Article 20 (3), the defendant Qiu commits the crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food, and is sentenced to eight months' imprisonment and a fine of RMB 5000.

（3） Typical significance

For a long time, "baking powder" has been a necessary food additive in the production of bread, and it is widely used. The Announcement of the National Health and Family Planning Commission and other five departments on Adjusting the Regulations on the Use of Aluminum Containing Food Additives stipulates that from July 1, 2014, "Aluminum containing food additives shall not be used in the production of puffed food, and aluminum potassium sulfate shall not be used in the production of wheat flour and its products. Baking powder "is a food additive containing aluminum. The state prohibits the use of "baking powder" to produce steamed buns. If it continues to be used, it is a criminal act and must be severely punished.

13、 Case of Zhang Yixiang, Zhang Qingyu, and Nong Xiuqin producing and selling toxic and harmful food

（1） Basic facts of the case

Since November 2012, the defendants Zhang Yixiang, Zhang Qingyu, and Nong Xiuqin have used hydrogen peroxide (commonly known as "hydrogen peroxide") to process beef louvers, tripe, and other foods in their self built houses on the left side of No. 145 Jinghua Road East, Yinhai Avenue, Liangqing District, Nanning City. After processing, the defendants Zhang Yixiang will sell them to Liuzhou, Hezhou, Guangxi, and Guizhou Province. On May 15, 2013, public security personnel seized 1074.4 kilograms of white finished beef yellow throat, 334 kilograms of white semi-finished beef yellow throat, 243.1 kilograms of white semi-finished beef louvers, 215.1 kilograms of white finished beef louvers, 583 kilograms of white finished beef tripe, 321 kilograms of white semi-finished beef tripe, 218.7 kilograms of black finished beef tripe, 206.4 kilograms of black semi-finished beef tripe, and 150 kilograms of raw beef tripe from Zhang Yixiang's processing site 20 kilograms of industrial caustic soda and two accounting books and other items. The Guangxi Institute of Product Quality Supervision and Inspection conducted a hydrogen peroxide content analysis on the food and processing materials extracted from the defendant Zhang Yixiang's processing site. Among them, the beef louver soaking water numbered G13-002652 and the beef yellow throat soaking water numbered G13-002654 did not meet the requirements of GB2760-2011, and hydrogen peroxide was detected from the unknown liquid numbered G13-002744.

（2） Judgment results

The People's Court of Liangqing District, Nanning City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region held that the defendants Zhang Yixiang, Zhang Qingyu, and Nong Xiuqin mixed toxic and harmful non food raw materials in the food produced and sold, and their actions constituted the crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food. Sentenced the defendant Zhang Yixiang to nine months in prison and a fine of RMB 5000; Sentence the defendant Zhang Qingyu to eight months' imprisonment and a fine of RMB 5000; The defendant, Nong Xiuqin, was sentenced to eight months in prison and fined RMB 3000. On January 9, 2014, the court made a judgment on this case in court, and the judgment has now come into effect.

（3） Typical significance

Hydrogen peroxide, also known as hydrogen peroxide, is a chemical and one of the prohibited food additives. After soaking food in hydrogen peroxide, the original nutritional components are destroyed. Eating these foods is harmful to the human body, can damage the gastric mucosa, and even cause cancer. The defendant used industrial hydrogen peroxide (commonly known as "hydrogen peroxide") and sodium hydroxide (commonly known as "caustic soda"), which are harmful to the human body and have a strong pungent odor, to soak and process food such as beef louvers, tripe, and yellow throat, and sold them to supermarkets, restaurants, and barbecue and night snack stalls in various cities and counties in Guangxi region. After a public trial, based on the facts identified in the case and the evidence cross-examined, the defendant's behavior in the final case was found to constitute the crime of producing and selling toxic and harmful food, and was sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment and fined, effectively safeguarding and maintaining the food safety of the general public.

14、 Zhang Jiazhang sells food that does not meet safety standards

（1） Basic facts of the case

One day in 2011, the defendant Zhang Jiazhang, in order to seek profits, picked up a sow with an unknown cause of death on the way home from selling pork, and transported the damn pig to Shicong Square in Zhanghuang Town, Pubei County to sell to an unknown man, receiving a payment of 100 yuan.

At around 11:00 am on August 9, 2012, the defendant Zhang Jiazhang, in order to seek profits, picked up a small pig with an unknown cause of death under the Lingganghu intersection bridge in Longmen Town, Pubei County, and transported the dead pig to Zhanghuang Town, Pubei County for sale. During the transportation, the pig was arrested by the public security organs. After inspection by the Guangxi Animal Disease Prevention and Control Center, swine fever virus (Class I animal disease) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (blue ear disease) virus nucleic acid (Class II animal disease) were detected from the seized dead pigs.

（2） Judgment results

After trial, the People's Court of Pubei County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region found that the defendant Zhang Jiazhang, in order to seek benefits, sold livestock animals with unknown causes of death, which violated Article 143 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and constituted the crime of selling food that did not meet safety standards. The charges charged by the prosecution authorities are established, and this court supports them. They should be held criminally responsible for the crime of selling food that does not meet safety standards. The defendant Zhang Jiazhang truthfully confessed his crime after being brought to justice, and may be given a lighter punishment in accordance with the law. According to relevant provisions of the Criminal Law, the defendant Zhang Jiazhang was sentenced to three months of detention and a fine of 2000 yuan for the crime of selling food that does not meet safety standards. Zhang Jiazhang accepted the verdict of the first instance.

（3） Typical significance

This case has occurred occasionally in rural areas, especially in economically underdeveloped areas. The occurrence of this case reflects the mentality of some people due to low income, greed for small bargains, disregard for food safety, weak legal awareness, low self-management level, improper handling methods for food that does not meet safety standards, and insufficient understanding of the social harm of illegal sales of food that does not meet safety standards. The legal trial of this case is of great significance for improving citizens' awareness of food safety, compliance with laws and regulations, and operating in accordance with the law.